TRUMP REPORTERS – TIME TO DO YOUR JOB
QUESTION 1 – TRUMP SONS AND THE MILITARY
If you are a follower of politics, I am sure you
have watched or heard a variety of political debates and interviews where the
interviewer or reporter failed to ask certain questions that you felt were
relevant. Me too!
For example, the other day I heard (and eventually
confirmed with online research), that current New Jersey Governor Chris
Christie, previously U.S. Attorney, prosecuted Jared Kushner’s dad, Jared Kushner
being Donald Trump’s son-in-law. Remember, Christie was a Trump competitor for
the Republican nomination for president before becoming a Trump “deer in the
headlights” supporter, campaign advisor, and potential VP candidate. Yet, for
the hundreds of hours of debates and political broadcasts I watched, and
newspaper articles I read, there were no questions for either Christie or Trump
pertaining to this issue, nor were there questions for Kushner or his wife,
Trump’s daughter Ivanka. It certainly appears relevant to me if one competitor
for the presidency had prosecuted the father of the son-in-law of another
competitor.
Now, with the beginning of the Republican
Convention to nominate Trump for president, there is a relevant question that
has yet to be asked of Mr. Trump, and that is, why neither of his sons
volunteered for the military after 9/11? Based on age, Trump’s oldest son would
have been eligible to join the military in 2001 while his second oldest son
would have been eligible within a couple years of 9/11 during the U.S. surge of
volunteers occurring subsequent to 9/11.
This question has risen to the level of germane
because of the bluster, patriotic fervor and hyperbolic self-promotion of Trump
campaign rhetoric, as illustrated by the following.
First, there is Trump’s identification as a New
York symbol, and as a New Yorker, more directly affected by the 9/11 attacks.
Second, Trump consistently states how much he loves the military and the vets
(his charitable ventures notwithstanding). Third, Trump consistently asks the
public to believe his claim (not plan)
that he is the only one who can lead the military and defeat the terrorists and
ISIS while other won’t do such, or have not done so in the past. Last, during
his NRA speech and during other interviews, and without being prompted, Trump
made an issue and bragged about the knowledge and skill that his sons have with
guns, their longtime membership in the NRA, and their hunting and marksmanship
skills.
In the context of the foregoing, you have the emotional
tie to New York and 9/11, you have the bluster and rhetoric of loving the
military and vets and being the only one to have a plan to lead the military to
defeat terrorism and ISIS, and you have the unprompted references to the love
of guns and hunting and shooting skills that Trump’s sons have. So, how come no
motivation or desire by the Trump boys (daddy was too old for service) to
volunteer for the “beloved” military where they could apply their gun and hunting
skills to defeat terrorists who were involved with the 9/11 attacks?
So reporters, please ask the question. It might be
that a partial answer is hidden in the fact that while the war against
terrorism was continuing in 2011 with U.S. military lives at risk on various
fronts, and a plan to capture and/or kill Bin-laden evolved in the
Trump-despised Obama White House, the Trump boys opted to go big-game hunting
in Africa. Is the “love” of the military and vets, the desire to get the
terrorists, and the love of hunting more satisfied on a safari, or serving your
country?
No comments:
Post a Comment